PENGGUNAAN ALAT BANTU BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI BALAI REHABILITASI SOSIAL PENYANDANG DISABILITAS FISIK (BRSPDF) WIRAJAYA THE USE OF ASSISTIVE DEVICES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN SOCIAL REHABILITATION CENTER WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES (BRSPD

Soetji Andari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31105/mipks.v44i3.2368
Abstract views: 107 | views : 31

Abstract

Abstrak

Penggunaan alat bantu bagi Penyandang disabilitas sangat penting untuk melakukan aktifitas sehari-hari. Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui penyandang disabilitas dalam memanfaatan alat bantu di Balai Rehabilitasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas Fisik (BRSPDF) Wirajaya. Sasaran penelitian  dilakukan terhadap 60 orang penyandang disabilitas dan merupakan responden. Responden sebagian besar laki-laki 61.67 % dengan rentang usia mereka cukup variatif dan tergolong remaja dan dewasa, berpendidikan SMA/sederajat tidak memiliki pekerjaan, dengan status perkawinan, 100 % belum kawin.  Pemberian alat bantu untuk layanan disabilitas fisik di Balai Rehabilitasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas Fisik (BRSPDF) Wirajaya perlu mempertimbangkan estetika responden dengan kondisi (postur tubuh). Pelaksanaan pemberian alat bantu hendaknya mengacu pada SOP yang disesuaikan dengan UU dan Perda yang ada di wilayah masing-masing. BBRVBD diharapkan dapat bekerjasama dengan psikolog untuk mengetahui dan memotivasi responden dalam menerima keterbatasannya dan mendorong responden lebih percaya diri dalam menjalani hidup.

Kata Kunci: Alat bantú; Disabilitas; Pemanfaatan; Rehabilitasi.

 

Abstract

The use of assistive devices for persons with disabilities is very important to carry out daily activities. This study was to identify persons with disabilities in using assistive devices at the Wirajaya Social Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities (BRSPDF). The research target was carried out on 60 people with disabilities and who were beneficiaries. Most of the respondents were male, 61.67%, with a fairly varied age range and classified as adolescents and adults, high school education / equivalent, do not have a job, with marital status, 100% are not yet married. The provision of assistive devices for physical and sensory deaf speech disability services at the Wirajaya Social Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities (BRSPDF) needs to consider the aesthetics of the beneficiaries with their condition (body posture). The implementation of the provision of tools should refer to the SOP which is adjusted to the existing laws and regulations in each region. The Rehabilitation Center is expected to collaborate with psychologists to identify and motivate beneficiaries to accept their limitations and encourage beneficiaries to be more confident in living their lives.

Keywords: Device ; Disabilities; Utilization; Rehabilitation

 

Keywords

Device ; Disabilities; Utilization; Rehabilitation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bappenas. (2009). Pedoman Evaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan Sektoral. Jakarta: Bappenas RI

Chambers, D., Wedel, K., and Rodwell, M. (1981). Evaluating Social Programs. New York, USA: Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Frye, Ann & Hemmer A.Paul (2012). Program Evaluation Models and Related Theories: AMEE guide no 67.NCBI.

Ghozali.( 2008). SEM Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square. Edisi 2. Semarang : BP-Undip

Infodatin, (2018), Disabilitas: Hari Disabilitas Internasional 3 Desember 2018, https://pusdatin.kemkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/infodatin/infodatin-disabilitas.pdf

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural Equations Modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Karim, M. A. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Penyandang Disabilitas di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan.

Kementerian Kesehatan, (2017), Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kesehatan Reproduksi bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Usia Dewasa, 3 Desember 2017 http://kesga.kemkes.go.id/images/pedoman/Pedoman%20Pelaksanaan%20Pelayanan%20Kespro%20Bagi%20Penyandang%20Disabilitas%20Usia%20Dewasa.pdf

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Panduan Umum Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai 2018

-----------------. (2017). Panduan Umum Bantuan Sosial Beras Sejahtera 2018

-----------------. (2017). Juklak dan Juknis Bantuan Sosial Beras Sejahtera 2017

-----------------. (2017). Juklak dan Juknis Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai 2017

Krejce, Robert V & Morgan, Darley. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities in Educational and Psychological Measurement Journal, Edition 30, 1970 P.607-610. Duluth: University of Minnesota.

Kusnendi. 2008. Model-Model Persamaan Struktural. Satu dan Multi-group Sample dengan LISREL. Bandung : Alfabeta

Lestari, E. (2017). Pemenuhan Hak Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Kabupeten Semarang Melalui Implementasi Convention on the Rights of person with disabillities (CPRD) dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Integralistik.

Milles, M.B & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An Expanded sourcebook. Newyork: SAGE Publication.

Ndaumanu, F. (2020). Hak Penyandang Disabilitas: Antara Tanggung Jawab dan Pelaksanaan oleh Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal HAM. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.131-150

Rossi, Petter H & Freeman, Howard. (1985). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Third Edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.

Samsul hadi dan Mutrofin. (2006). Pengantar Metode Riset Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: PT.Kurnia Kalam Semesta.

Sax, G. (1980). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation, (2nd ed.). California: Wandsworth Publishing Company.

Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinfield, A.J. (1985). Systematic evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Nijhof Publishing.

Szmukler, G., Daw, R., & Callard, F. (2014). Mental health law and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.024

Tula, J. J. (2015). Pelayanan Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Menggunakan Berbagai Sarana Aksebilitas. Kementrian Sosial Republik Indonesia.

World Bank (1986). Sustainability of ProJects: Review of Experience in The Fertilizer Subsector: Februari 26. Washington DC: Word Ban

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.