Sinergi Pemerintah dan Perguruan Tinggi menuju Desa Maju dan Bermartabat melalui Implementasi Program Desa Sejahtera Mandiri

Kissumi Diyanayati, nfn Suryani, A. Nururrochman Hidayatullah

Abstract


This study used a combined approach that were quantitative and qualitative (mix methods). The location of the research and data sources were determined by purposive sampling which was five universities with five districts with each of the two DSM program implementations. The five universities are UNJA (Muaro Jambi), UIN Antasari (Tapin), UNHAS (Bantaeng), UNEJ (Jember), and UNISSULA (Semarang). The research data source per location is 30 people consist of 10 college universities (lecturers and KKN students), social institution and related offices /institutions including 10 regency business district, village apparatus and PSKS program implementer including 10 person program companion. the total number of respondents were 150 people. Crosscheck performance outcomes were performed on four members of the beneficiary community. The results of the study found that stakeholders still have a poor understanding of the DSM program. Proven in five research sites cumulatively majority of respondents (55.33%) are less understood, 32.67 percent understood enough, and only 12 percent who understand. Respondents who understand came from DSM program managers of higher education and local social services. Respondents who do not understand about DSM program reach 55.33 percent comes from elements of KKN students, related OPD officials outside the social service and village officials. Understanding of DSM program due to lack of whereby socialization activities. Nevertheless, target villages such as
village apparatus, Karang Taruna, TKSK, PKH facilitators, and community leaders are ready to make changes according to the objectives of the DSM program so that the community will be more prosperous and become an independent village. The third year of DSM program implementation in five locations found that the activities undertaken by universities are
still limited to pioneering activities ideally done in the first year (2015). There is no visible coordination of universities with the district government so that has not been prepared synergy program between the OPD for the target village. Development program run partially by the OPD in accordance with the duties and functions of each. In order for DSM to achieve optimal results, it is recommended to socialize DSM program from the central level to the village location and to form taskforce /task force for DSM program implementation at the district level. Higher Education as the main companion of DSM program need to arrange planning activities in the form of roadmap which contains stage of activity and involvement of various parties

 


Keywords


Implementation; Programs; Desa Sejahtera Mandiri

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, Isbandi Rukminto, (2008), Inrervensi Komunitas: Pengembangan Masyarakat sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Jakarta: CV Rajawali Press.

Sunartiningsih, Agnes 2004, Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media

Ife, Jim. 1995, Community Development Creating Community Alternative-Vision, Analysis and Practice, Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman Australi Pty Limited

———— dan Frank Tesoriero, (2008), Community Development

: Alternatif Pembangunan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi,Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Khatib Pahlawan Kayo, 2009, Karakteristik Organisasi Sosial, Jakarta, Departemen Sosial

Midgley, James, 2005, Pembangunan Sosial, Perspektif Pembangunan dalam Kesejahteraan Sosial, Jakarta: Diperta Depag RI

Onny S Prijono & A.M.W Pranarka 1996, Pemberdayaan: Konsep, Kebijakan dan Implementasi, Jakarta: CSIS

Payne, M. 1997, Modern Social Work Theory. Second Edition. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.

Randy R Wrihatnolo dan Riant Nugroho D, 2007, Managemen Pemberdayaan Sebuah Pengantar dan Panduan, Jakarta, Elex Competindo (kelompok Gramedia)

Soetarso, 1993, Praktek Pekerjaan Sosial, Bandung: STKS

Suharto, Edi, 2005, Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Masyarakat, Bandung : Rafika Aditama.

———————— ,2005, Analisis Kebijakan Publik : Panduan Praktis Mengkaji Permasalahan dan Kebijakan Sosial, Bandung : Alfabeta.

———————— 2007, Kebijakan Sosial sebagai Kebijakan

Publik, Bandung: Alfabeta.

———————— 2007. Pembangunan, Kebijakan Sosial

& Pekerjaan Sosial, Bandung: LSP-STKS

————————— 2009. Kemiskinan dan Perlindungan

Sosial Di Indonesia. Cet. I, Bandung: Alfabeta.

———————— 2010. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Cetakan ke empat. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama

Suradi, dkk, 2013, Kebijakan Pemberdayaan Sosial Komunitas Adat Terpencil, Jakarta : Puslitbangkesos dan P3KS Press.

Wahyudin Supeno, 2005, Kiat-kiat Memberdayakan Masyarakat, Solo: Kerjasama yayasan Duta Awan Solo dengan Chatolic Relief Service (CRS) Jakarta.

Zastrow, Ch. (2014). Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare: Empowering people. 10 th Ed. Belmont, USA: Brook/Cole.

Dokumen lainnya

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 tahun 2009 tentang Kesejahteraan

Sosial

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2011 tentang Penanganan

Fakir Miskin

Peraturan Menteri Sosial RI, No. 184 Tahun 2011 Tentang

Lembaga Kesejahteraan Sosial

Kepmensos Nomor 146/HUK/2013 tentang Penetapan

Kriteria dan Pendataan Fakir Miskin dan Orang tidak Mampu

SK Mensos Nomor 40/HUK/KEP/X/1980

Paparan Direktur PSPK&KM, Direktorat Jenderal Dayasos,

Kompas, 9 April 2015

Coomunispace, (tt), “Kebutuhan Sosial”, www.mikrobisnis.

com.

http://www.ask.com, download 18/02/14, “What is Social

Institution?”.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31105/jpks.v17i2.1430

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31105/jpks.v17i2.1430.g850

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times